Whoa, you're using an old browsers aren't you? This site would look better if you upgraded. We recommend Mozilla Firefox

NE1015: Biological Improvement, Habitat Restoration, and Horticultural Development of Chestnut by Management of Populations, Pathogens, and Pests

Duration:
October 01, 2003 to September 30, 2008
Administrative Advisor(s):
Michael E. Vayda (VT.)
NIFA Reps:
Robert M. Nowierski

Statement of Issue(s) and Justification:

Before the introduction of chestnut blight, American chestnut was one of the most valuable trees in eastern North American forests. When Europeans first settled eastern North America, chestnut was a major and eminently notable forest tree everywhere from Ontario to Georgia. It was the one eastern forest tree that approached the dimensions of the gigantic Pacific Coast rain forest conifers; thus, it was referred to as the 'Redwood of the East'. Chestnut occupied a wide range of site types, ranging from mesic to xeric. Quality chestnut on mesic sites attained a clear trunk length of up to 72 feet with an overall height of 120 feet and a diameter of 5 feet. Dry, thin, acidic ridge top soils provided the poorest growing conditions, but chestnut still managed to grow to a height of 70 feet. The tree was prized for its high quality wood, tannin extracts, and nuts. Chestnut blight disease eliminated the American chestnut as a canopy species and elevated oaks as the most dominant tree group in the southern Appalachians. However, widespread oak decline has occurred in the southeastern U.S. over the past 20 years, leading to declining forests. It is believed that southern Appalachian forest ecosystems will not be considered healthy until chestnut can be reintroduced as a functioning component of that ecosystem. Loss of the American chestnut resulted in significant biological and economic changes. Replacement species generally include red oak, black oak, and chestnut oak, all much slower growing than chestnut. Return of chestnut to eastern forests could vastly improve existing forest stands, and positively impact wildlife, since chestnuts produce seed every year as opposed to oaks and hickories.

The NE-140 Technical Committee was organized in 1982, and since then, members have worked cooperatively to investigate the complex issues involved with the biological improvement of chestnut, along with habitat restoration and horticultural development of American chestnut and chestnut cultivars. Environmental and land stewardship issues that are concerns to stakeholders are addressed by NE-140 through efforts to understand the ecology and biology of eastern North American forests following the loss of American chestnut. Control of chestnut blight disease through the use of hypoviruses and resistant chestnut trees may vastly improve forest stands in eastern North America, answering many concerns regarding forest ecology. Other important issues of this continued work are improved forest management, including biological-based controls of invasive insect and disease organisms threatening chestnut. This will serve as a model for natural resource managers. Food safety issues are addressed via the creation and use of IPM-based controls of both forest and orchard trees, reducing the use of pesticides. Increased use of chestnuts in the American diet will improve human health, since chestnuts are unique among nuts with fat content ranges from 1-10%, compared to 70% in most other nuts. The viability of rural communities will be enhanced through creation of a new horticultural chestnut market.

Restoration of chestnut as a timber tree and improving orchard chestnuts in the United States continue to be the long-term goals of the members of this regional project. To succeed in our efforts to achieve these long-term goals, continued activity of the award-winning NE-140 group is critical. NE-140 is working to successfully develop and deploy biological systems that protect natural resources and the environment. NE-140 must sustain its rapid, productive trajectory in order to develop effective, biological-based solutions to address the ecosystem disruption caused by invasion of the chestnut blight fungus (Cryphonectria parasitica) and death of billions of American chestnut trees (Castanea dentata).

In the shorter term, we continue to build on our understanding of two biological approaches to the control of chestnut blight disease: use of biocontrol agents to control the fungus populations, and tree breeding to improve the fitness of the trees. Efforts to understand the molecular, organismal, and ecological basis of C. parasitica infection, and the critical role of hypoviruses and defective mitochondria, are essential for successful development and deployment of IPM programs. NE-140 is further developing hypovirulent strains of C. parasitica for use in IPM programs to protect timber and orchard chestnut trees, and seeking environmentally safe techniques to control pathogens such as Phytophthora root rot and pests such as the oriental chestnut gall wasp.

Currently NE-140 is: 1. incorporating, by standard breeding and transgenic approaches, chestnut blight resistance and gall wasp tolerance into chestnut for planting in forests and orchards 2. working to conserve native Castanea population diversity for future use in forests and orchards, including working with the National Plant Germplasm System of the USDA to establish germplasm repositories in California and Missouri 3. studying the ecology and cultural requirements of chestnut in nurseries and natural settings, leading to the reintroduction of chestnut into the forest 4. testing new chestnut cultivars, systematically documenting information on existing cultivars, establishing germplasm repositories for cultivar material, and testing new orchard management methods to enable U.S. growers to compete against U.S. fresh market imports

NE 140 has broadened its membership over the past five years to reflect the increasing breadth of chestnut research activity and bring additional research expertise to bear. The members of this group are strongly dependent on each other for the success of their individual projects. Working collaboratively, they seek to reverse the effects of devastating pathogens, find ways of dealing with new imported pests, and conduct research in support of the nascent horticultural chestnut industry.

The technical feasibility of the research. NE-140 is one of the nation's most productive research groups. Over the last five years (1998-2002), publications included 86 research papers, book chapters, reviews, and popular articles (plus an additional 169 publications from 1993-1997). Due to the growing interest in chestnut throughout the U.S., NE-140 also has expanded the breadth of institutions, researchers, and research sites beyond the Northeast region to more effectively address the multiple issues and foci related to chestnut.

The advantages for doing the work as a multistate effort. The scope, breadth, and magnitude of the effort required to combat chestnut blight disease, address other critical pathogen and pest problems, understand ecosystem processes involved in reestablishment of chestnut in the natural forest, and develop chestnut as a new orchard crop alternative for growers are far beyond the capability of any individual researcher or institution. Combined talents in molecular biology, genomics, virology, entomology, pathology, ecology, and horticulture, available across many U.S. institutions and use of numerous test sites throughout the Northeast and into the Midwest (plus a site in California) are required to effectively address the issues facing NE-140.

What the likely impacts will be from successfully completing the work. Successful completion of NE 140 goals will lead to a number of positive impacts including: reestablishment of timber chestnut trees in eastern N. America; improved stand diversity of eastern hardwood forests; successful reintroduction of chestnuts into xeric sites formerly populated by oak species decimated by gypsy moth infestations, in order to provide mast and wood products; establishment of productive nut-bearing chestnut trees in both eastern and western N. A. where a new industry is rapidly developing; and, improved economic opportunities for chestnut growers in local and international markets.

Related, Current, and Previous Work:

The total decimation of the American chestnut by chestnut blight disease had significant biological and economic impacts. During the first two decades of the 20th Century, exhaustive attempts were made to control the disease. When it was apparent that all control attempts were unsuccessful, several breeding programs were initiated. The goal of these breeding programs was to develop blight resistant American chestnut. The USDA initiated one of the first resistance breeding programs in the 1920's. Unfortunately, this program was discontinued in 1960, as their efforts in breeding a blight-resistant American chestnut were unsuccessful. Hope was renewed when C. parasitica isolates with reduced virulence (hypovirulent) were discovered in Europe.

The phenomenon of hypovirulence results in a lowered pathogenicity of the fungal pathogen, allowing the tree to utilize its natural defense mechanisms and maintain vigor. Cankers are not eliminated, but the tree can produce adequate callus tissue and wall off the infection. This discovery reawakened the scientific community to the long-standing issue of chestnut blight disease. Modern scientific investigative techniques could be applied to both the fungal pathogen and the tree host. Two additional breeding institutions began breeding chestnut trees for blight resistance using modern genetic principals: The University of Tennessee-Knoxville and The American Chestnut Foundation in Meadowview, VA. These two programs complimented the one at The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station (CAES), the only program that has continued uninterrupted since its initiation by Arthur Graves in 1930. The large collection of species and chestnut hybrids, maintained over the years by CAES, are available to all who need breeding material. When it became clear that the oriental chestnut gall wasp (Dryocosmus kuriphilus), introduced into GA in 1974, was spreading northward, the breeding programs discussed ways to incorporate screening for gall wasp resistance into their plans.

NE-140 had it beginnings in 1978, when approximately 200 people attended a symposium held in Morgantown, WV at West Virginia University. There were 34 papers given, and the ensuing discussion convinced the group that a Regional Research Committee was needed. In 1982, five experiment station scientists agreed to participate. Within a few short years, the committee grew to include 13 experiment stations and other participating academic institutions and governmental units. As a result of this groups activities, the following events have occurred:

  1. CT has improved the records of holdings and continues to maintain the finest collection of species and hybrids of chestnut in the world (6). CT imported hypovirulent strains from Dr. J. Grente in France (who first described the cytoplasmically-transmissible disease of the fungus) and demonstrated that these hypovirus-infected strains could control chestnut blight cankers on American chestnut trees (8). CT described a genetic system of vegetative compatibility in the blight fungus that prevented strain fusion and the transmission of hypovirulence viruses (1, 2, 3).
  2. NY (Cornell) confirmed, by making genetic tests of Asian and American populations, that the blight fungus entered the US from Japan (57).
  3. MI described the spread of American hypovirulence viruses through the blight fungus population in a stand of trees planted in MI (45). MI described a type of hypovirulence determined by genes in mitochondria (56). MI presented a physical and genetic map of the mitochondrial genome of a strain of the blight fungus (13). MI, NJ, and WV described and compared three American hypovirulence viruses (29, 71).
  4. NJ, MD, MI, and TX spearheaded the naming of Cryphonectria hypoviruses as a new family (Hypoviridae), now recognized by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (49,50).
  5. MD transformed virulent strains of the blight fungus with cDNA copies of hypovirulence virus RNA genes, and produced stable, transgenic hypovirulent strains with virus genes and fungal genes together in the nucleus (21,22).
  6. MD, CT, and WV were granted permission from USDA/Plant Quarantine to test transgenic hypovirulent strains of the chestnut blight fungus in the forests of CT and WV. This was the first permit granted to test transgenic organisms for their ability to spread and effect biological control of a plant disease (7).
  7. KY, MI, TX, MD, VA, and CT have made detailed studies of enzymes produced by the blight fungus that may be related to its ability to kill chestnut trees (5, 15, 20, 23, 24, 25, 30, 31, 32, 35, 37, 38, 41, 43, 44, 52, 53, 56, 62, 70, 76).
  8. KY and CT have studied enzyme systems in chestnut trees that may be related to their ability to resist the blight fungus (36, 39, 40, 61, 65, 66, 67,68,69).
  9. VA, CT, and TN have been breeding chestnut trees and selecting progeny for resistance to chestnut blight disease and with the timber-form of American chestnut trees (4). These will be ready for release within five years.
  10. MS, VA, MA, and CT prepared a genetic map of chestnuts and found three molecular markers associated with resistance to chestnut blight disease (54).
  11. MO, TN, MI, KS, CT, and CA have initiated cultivar trials of exotic chestnuts (Chinese, Japanese, and European in origin), with the goal of developing chestnut research orchards, thereby creating a U.S. chestnut industry.
More recent findings, 1998-2002, include:

Objectives

  1. To improve chestnut trees for reestablishment in forest ecosystems, and chestnut cultivars for nut production by selection, breeding, and marketing, and determine the cultural criteria of all chestnuts for successful production in nurseries, orchards, and/or natural settings.
  2. To evaluate and integrate multiple approaches for the biological control of the chestnut blight fungus and other pathogens and pests that threaten chestnut, by investigating host/pathogen/parasite relationships from the molecular to the ecological level.

Methods:


Objective 1: To improve chestnut trees for reestablishment in forest ecosystems, and chestnut cultivars for nut production by selection, breeding, and marketing, and determine the cultural criteria of all chestnuts for successful production in nurseries, orchards, and/or natural settings.

Traditional breeding programs are being carried out in CT, TN, and VA. All three programs share chestnut pollen and seed as needed. Crosses are made in the spring (early July), seeds harvested in the fall (October), and planted the following spring. Tests for blight resistance are made when the seedlings are 3 to 5 years old by inoculating branches with pure cultures of the blight fungus and noting canker enlargement rate. All three programs will soon be able to enhance selection using molecular markers. Assessment for form and nut quality may be done on 5-year-old trees.

Identification of molecular markers is being done in MS and MA with plant material supplied by all NE-140 members. Genetic input is provided by TACF staff in VA and NC. The work to date has concentrated on identifying Chinese chestnut-specific markers for resistance to chestnut blight disease and is now being expanded to examine Japanese chestnut markers as well. A collaboration with Forest Service personnel in Delaware, OH, is being initiated to use RAPD markers to select among backcross progeny for American traits other than susceptibility to blight. There has been difficulty identifying all 12 linkage groups in crosses of Chinese and American chestnut, due to segregation distortion and underlying anomalies. Blight resistance is associated with the linkage groups where segregation distortion has been observed. An attempt is being made to cross-reference the American x Chinese chestnut genetic map with a European chestnut genetic map, where all 12 linkage groups have been identified, and to associate linkage groups with chromosomes by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Mapping populations that are not based on recombination between species also are being assembled, where segregation distortion is not expected to occur. More than 500 markers have been mapped, including about 250 RAPD markers (MS), 250 AFLPs (NC), 20 SSRs (MS), 19 cDNA RFLPs (MA), two cloned functional genes (cystatin and the 5-S Ribosomal RNA gene) (MS), and 6 isozymes (AL).

Plant tissue culture laboratories in GA and NY (SUNY) will maintain and multiply important clones of chestnut hybrids produced by VA, CT, and TN. To enhance somatic seedling production from embryogenic cultures of American chestnut for mass clonal propagation and gene transfer applications, work will continue to establish new embryogenic cultures, develop protocols for high-frequency somatic embryo production and test cultural and environmental variables for enhancement of somatic seedling production.

GA will also develop cultures of trees in native populations of American chinquapins (C. pumila var. pumila and var. ozarkensis ), threatened by chestnut blight disease and Phytophthora root rot, to ensure that important germplasm is not lost. Chinese chinquapins (C. henryi) are available in GA, and will be included in the program. All three chinquapin types seem to have valuable resistance to the oriental chestnut gall wasp (D. kuriphylus), which is currently found in GA, AL, TN, and NC. NY (SUNY) efforts include the development of five constructed genes for resistance to blight that will be put into somatic embryos of chestnut using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

Plantings of new hybrids for assessment of resistance to gall wasp, chestnut blight, and Phytophthora root rot have been made and will continue to expand. This work is being done by TN (plantings in TN), and by CT (plantings in cooperation with U.S.D.A./ARS, Tree Nut Research Laboratory, Byron, GA and with U.S.D.A./Forest Service, Bent Creek Research Forest, Asheville, NC). TN is using Japanese stock plants with reported resistance to gall wasp, and CT is using American chinquapins and Chinese chinquapins with reported resistance. The breeding programs will seek to identify the two genetic bases of resistance and then combine their lines if that seems useful.

Existing populations of American chestnut trees must be protected for future inclusion in breeding programs and for inclusion in genetic diversity studies. Chestnut biomass is being maintained by planting seed collected from natural populations. Cytoplasmic and transgenic hypoviruses are then introduced into maintained populations and seed orchards. Native populations currently being protected are located in CT, NY, MA, ME, NJ, VA, PA, MD, WV, NC, TN, and GA. Valuable plantings in WI are being maintained, as well. In MI plantings of American chestnut trees are apparently being protected from blight by debilitation of the fungus by a DNA plasmid in the mitochondria of C. parasitica.

Trees grown from cobalt-irradiated American chestnut seed in the 1950s, which were planted at the National Colonial Farm in VA, have been evaluated for blight resistance. These trees have large, healing cankers that produce significant amounts of callus tissue. Seedlings of these trees have been planted in MI to determine whether the callus production is a function of the trees or the area in which they are planted. Testing is being conducted by MI, VA, and WV.

Chestnuts imported by the U.S.D.A. and planted prior to 1960 are being evaluated for resistance to chestnut blight disease, Phytophthora root rot, and gall wasp by CT and TN. A $10,000 request has been made from the fruit and nut tree improvement group at UC Davis to help establish newly imported chestnuts from other areas in the U.S. This initiation is intended to relocate the germplasm repository for chestnut currently located at College Station, TX to the National Clonal Germplasm Repository at UC-Davis. The University of Missouri-Columbia has offered to serve as the eastern U.S. chestnut germplasm repository in concert with UC Davis.

To help reestablish chestnut in its native range, edaphic, silvicultural, and landscape factors influencing forest planting techniques will be studied by CT, TN, VA, and MI. Further, effects of chestnut restoration on forest ecosystem dynamics and community composition will be evaluated in CT, MI, WI, WV, VA, and TN. Natural populations and orchards in CT and WV will be examined for the effect of competing vegetation on tree survival.

Nut production trials of commercially available chestnut cultivars are underway in CT, TN, MO, and KS. Commercial plantings in MI are being monitored in a pollination study to determine whether pollination is a problem in a two-cultivar orchard. Resistance to chestnut blight disease is documented for many cultivars from China and Japan, but winter hardiness is unknown. To date, the most commonly planted cultivar in the U.S. (mostly on the west coast) is 'Colossal', a European X Japanese hybrid with some resistance to chestnut blight. Trials in TN are underway to test 'Colossal' and other cultivars for resistance to chestnut blight disease, Phytophthora root rot, and oriental chestnut gall wasp. MI and CT will conduct blight resistance and Phytophthora root rot trials, and assess 'Colossal' for winter hardiness and blight resistance.

To help foster a U.S. chestnut industry, chestnut production and management techniques for orchard production will be tested in MI, MO, KS, TN, CT, and CA. Optimum growing practices will be developed and resulting information shared with producers. Marketing research will be conducted in MI and MO focused on development of domestic markets for chestnuts produced in the U.S. Work will be undertaken to better understand underlying market dynamics and identify niche market and value added opportunities. Chestnuts from orchard selections are being evaluated for nutrient and lipid content.

Objective 2: To evaluate and integrate multiple approaches for the biological control of the chestnut blight fungus and other pathogens and pests that threaten chestnut, by investigating and linking host/pathogen/parasite relationships from the molecular to the ecological level.

Spread of the chestnut blight fungus is being studied in natural populations of American chestnuts and orchards of species and hybrids. This work is in progress in CT, NJ (cooperating with NY), NY, and WV (with MI). These projects include work on the vegetative incompatibility system of the fungus, and specific vic genes used as markers. The spread of hypoviruses is being monitored in natural and planted populations in CT (with MD), NJ (with NY), NY, WV (with NJ, MI, and NY), and TN (with CT and WV). Also, trees planted in MI, where natural hypoviruses developed, are being monitored by MI (with WV).

American chestnut seeds planted in the 1880s, 600 km beyond the natural range in West Salem, WI, have produced a population of more than 3,000 American chestnut trees. These trees grew blight-free for more than 100 years, but in 1986 the stand become infected with chestnut blight disease. Hypovirulent strains of the fungus were introduced between 1992-1997 in an attempt to establish biological control. The treatment is supervised and monitored by MI, WV, NY, and the WI Department of Natural Resources (Jane Cummings-Carlson). Assessment of disease progress, spread of two introduced hypoviruses, and canker evaluation, continues at the West Salem stand. Demographics of the West Salem stand will be quantified via a multi-institutional collaboration between NY, MI, MN, WI, and WV. An annual assessment of the crown health and disease status of the stand will be conducted, as will survey and evaluation of the vegetative compatibility, mating type, and virulence/hypovirulence status of individual C. parasitica infections. GIS will be employed to map all chestnut stems and the coordinates combined with the above data to quantify disease and hypovirus spread. Ecological effects of disease development on the population dynamics of the stand will be measured by relating changes in stand composition to the developing epidemic. The contribution of host genotype to biological control will be measured by taking scion wood from trees displaying the most recovery and trees displaying the least. Grafts will be made onto rootstock in MI, and after a period of growth, the grafts will be inoculated with C. parasitica to see if trees respond differently.

The ability of transgenic hypovirulent C. parasitica strains to produce hypovirulent sexual and asexual inoculum when introduced into natural and artificially-established blight cankers in a forest setting will be evaluated by researchers in WV and CT, both working with MD where the strains were developed. Forest sites with high numbers of 6-12 cm dbh American chestnut sprouts have been selected for release of transgenic hypovirulent C. parasitica strains. Naturally-occurring and artificially-established infections will be exposed to sexually compatible, transgenic inoculum containing nuclear cDNA copies of either the highly debilitating hypovirus CHV1-EP713 or the moderately debilitating hypovirus CHV1-Euro 7. The hypovirus infection status of sexual and asexual inoculum produced by the treated cankers will be measured, as will new cankers that arise, to further define the importance of balancing hypovirulence and ecological fitness for establishment of effective biological control. Studies conducted in CT and WV (in conjunction with MD) will help elucidate whether C. parasitica population replacement by hypoviruses-infected strains is possible.

Breeding studies conducted by TACF (VA) will be linked to hypovirulence studies by comparing the ability of various generations of Chinese X American hybrids and American chestnut to harbor virulent and hypovirulent C. parasitica infections. This work will be cooperative between MD, VA (TACF), and WV. Test orchards of American and American X Chinese chestnut hybrids of known lineage will be established at the WV University Experimental Farm. After a 3-5 year growth period, artificial inoculations will be made using C. parasitica isolates that previously have been characterized for their level of virulence/hypovirulence. As infections develop, they will be evaluated for their growth and production of sexual and asexual inoculum. Comparisons will then be made to estimate how the resistance of the back-crossed-chestnuts combines with the debilitating effects of hypovirus infection to regulate chestnut blight disease.

Alternative controls for chestnut blight disease are being sought in MA, using naturally-occurring bark microorganisms, such as Trichoderma sp. and Bacillus sp. Work will continue to determine the microbial ecology of the interaction between C. parasitica and the fungi and bacteria that exist on the bark of American chestnut trees.

Through work done in MD, the molecular biology of the host/pathogen/parasite system of Castanea/C. parasitica/Hypovirus is beginning to yield valuable information about the basis of the interactions. Mapping of the viral determinants responsible for changes in fungal phenotype has been accomplished with the aid of infectious cDNA clones of the severe hypovirus strain CHV1-EP713 and the related mild strain CHV1-Euro7 (16). Mapping approaches include construction of functional chimeric viruses from the CHV1-EP713 and CHV1-Euro7 infectious cDNA clones, deletion mutagenesis of infectious hypovirus cDNA clones, systematic repair of deletion mutants, site specific mutagenesis and construction of hypovirus based gene vectors (2,10,15,16). These studies will be expanded during the next funding period to map additional viral determinants. Identified determinants and the polyprotein processing of a large portion of the second viral-encoded open reading frame, ORF B, will be characterized in detail.

NY has determined that C. parasitica isolates have a mixed mating system in which both selfing and outcrossing occurs in the same population. Selfing isolates of C. parasitica will be examined to determine whether they have both mating types in the same thallus. Results from this study will help answer the following questions: Under what conditions does selfing occur? If it is genetically determined is the genetic structure of populations affected? Additionally, the diversity and evolution of Cryphonectria hypoviruses will be examined to determine how these viruses have evolved. In particular, how they have migrated among different geographic regions? Phylogenetic analyses of CHV-1 among continents will be conducted. The mechanism in which viruses are transmitted horizontally between vegetative compatibility (vc) types is being pursued by studying sequence variation in CHV-1 from different vc types.

Sequencing and comparisons of the hypoviruses will be done by NJ, MI, MD, WV, and CA working cooperatively. Studies of the effect of specific fungal genes on hypovirus replication and gene expression will be done in MD, NJ, and CA. The function of the fungal genes as sex pheromones, and their involvement in virulence will be examined in CA. The use of hypoviruses as gene expression vectors, and the introduction of hypoviruses into other fungal pathogens (for biological control of other plant diseases) will be studied (MD).

To further our understanding of the molecular interaction between C. parasitica and the hypovirus CHV-1, the attenuation of virulence will be characterized and the role of a kex2 specific secretion pathway in C. parasitica development and virulence will be analyzed (CA).

Hypovirulence caused by mitochondrial mutations and mobile genetic elements will continue to be studied (MI).

Studies will be initiated to create a better understanding of the function of the anthraquinone pigments and other secondary metabolites in the biology of the chestnut blight fungus. Isolation and characterization of genes of the pigment biosynthetic pathway are being studied to further understand the viral/fungal interaction. Molecular genetics approaches are being used in combination with analytical chemistry analyses to identify genes for polyketide biosynthesis in C. parasitica (NY).

Measurement of Progress and Results:

Outputs:
Outcomes or projected Impacts:
Milestones:

(2004):

  • Breeding program begun for selecting improved protein content, peelability, and blight resistance in high yielding orchard-based chestnut cultivars (Endowed chestnut experiment station, Rogers Reserve Farm, MI).
  • Nuts collected for nutritional analyses and size comparison from orchard selections and cultivars of chestnut.
  • Hypovirulent strains of C. parasitica developed and deployed for blight control on native chestnut trees at each of three clear-cut forest areas and one nursery area planted with hybrid chestnut trees.
  • Scion wood collected from WI American chestnut trees surviving well with hypovirulence in the C. parasitica population, grafted onto root stocks in MI.
  • Site selected for release of new transgenic-hypovirulent strains of C. parasitica in WV.

    (2005):

    (2006):

    (2007):

    (2008):

    Projected Participation:

    Include a completed Appendix E form

    Outreach Plan:

    The annual meeting of NE-140 serves as the mechanism to keep members and other interested parties abreast of current research and related chestnut activities (i.e., ancillary symposia, annual meetings, international exchanges). Information on this meeting and shared projects is available on the NE-140 web site. NE-140 members will continue to make research results available through scientific journals, both refereed and non-refereed, extension bulletins, and national and international conferences and workshops. Information to the general public will be disseminated via publications in the popular press, magazines, oral and written presentations at workshops and at producer field days. A listing of all publications developed by NE-140 members will be updated annually and posted on the NE-140 website in NIMSS at www.lgu.umd.edu.

    Organization and Governance:

    The organization of regional research project NE-140 was established in accordance with the format suggested in the "Manual for Cooperative Regional Research". One person at each participating agency is designated, with approval of the agency director, as the voting member of the Technical Committee. Other agency individuals and interested parties are encouraged to participate as non-voting members of the committee. Each year, members elect a Secretary. The Secretary, whose duties begin the following year, then becomes Chair-elect, followed by Chair the third year.

    Literature Cited:

    Anagnostakis, S.L. 1977. Vegetative incompatibility in Endothia parasitica. Experimental Mycology 1:306-316.

    Anagnostakis, S.L. 1983. Conversion to curative morphology in Endothia parasitica and its restriction by vegetative compatibility. Mycologia 75:777-780.

    Anagnostakis, S.L. 1988. Cryphonectria parasitica, cause of chestnut blight. p123-136 IN: Advances in Plant Pathology, volume 6 Genetics of Plant Pathogenic Fungi, D.S. Ingram, P.H. Williams, and G.S. Sidhu, eds., Academic Press, New York.

    Anagnostakis, S. L. 1992. History of chestnut breeding in the United States. p19-21 IN: Proceedings of the World Chestnut Industry Conference, R. D. Wallace and L. G. Spinella, eds., Chestnut Marketing Association Press, Alachua, FL.

    Anagnostakis, S. L. 1992. Search for novel peroxidases in chestnut that result from the interaction of trees with the chestnut blight fungus. p108-110 IN: Proceedings of the International Chestnut Conference, M. L. Double and W. L. MacDonald, eds., West Virginia University Press, Morgantown.

    Anagnostakis, S.L. 1992. Measuring resistance of chestnut trees to chestnut blight. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22:568-571.

    Anagnostakis, S.L. 1995 The pathogens and pests of chestnut. P125-145 IN: Advances in Botanical Research, volume 21, J. H. Andrews and I Tommerup, eds., Academic Press, New York.

    Anagnostakis, S.L. and R.A. Jaynes. 1973. Chestnut blight control: use of hypovirulent cultures. Plant Disease Reporter 57:225-226.

    Anagnostakis, S. L., Chen, B., Geletka, G. M. and Nuss, D. L. Hypovirus transmission to ascospore progeny by field released transgenic hypovirulent strains of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Phytopathology, 86, 301-310, 1998.

    Anderson, P.J. and W.H. Rankin. 1914. Endothia canker of chestnut. Bulletin #347, Cornell University AES, Ithaca, NY, 620 pp.

    Baidyaroy D., Huber D.H., Fulbright D.W., and Bertrand H. 2000. Transmissible mitochondrial hypovirulence in a natural population of Cryphonectria parasitica. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. 13(1):88-95.

    Balbalian C.J., MacDonald W.L., Huber D.H. and Fulbright D.W. 1998. Effects of Cryphonectria parasitica in vegetative compatibility genes on the transmission of hypoviruses between strains on chestnut trees. Phytopathology 88: 5128 (abstr.).

    Bell, J. A., Monterio-Vitorello, C. B., Hausner, G., Fulbright, D. W. and Bertrand, H. 1996. Physical and genetic map of the mitochondrial genome of Cryphonectria parasitica EP155. Current Genetics 30: 34-43.

    Biraghi, A. 1953. Possible active resistance to Endothia parasitica in Castanea sativa. Report to the 11th Congress of the International Union of Forest Research Organisation, Rome.

    Carpenter, C.E., R.J. Mueller, P. Kazmierczak. L. Zhang, D.K. Villalon, and N.K. Van Alfen. 1992. Effect of a virus on accumulation of a tissue-specific cell-surface protein of the fungus Cryphonectria (Endothia) parasitica. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 5:55-61.

    Chaloux P.H. 2000. Virulence of Cryphonectria parasitica hypoviruses from previous release sites. M.S. Thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. 94 pp.

    Chaloux P.H., Liu Y.C., Milgroom M.G. and MacDonald W.L. 1998. The effects of dsRNAs on growth and sporulation of Cryphonectria parasitica isolates recovered from previous hypovirus introduction sites. Phytopathology 88: 5129 (abstr.).

    Chen, B., Geletka, L. M. and Nuss, D. L. 2000. Using chimeric hypoviruses to fine-tune the interaction between a pathogenic fungus and its plant host. J. Virol. 74:7562-7567, 2000.

    Chen, B. and Nuss, D. L. 1999. Infectious cDNA clone of hypovirus CHV1-Euro7: a comparitive virology approach to investigate virus-mediated hypovirulence of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica, J. Virol. 73:985-992.

    Choi, G.H. and D.L. Nuss. 1990. Nucleotide sequence of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene from Cryphonectria parasitica. Nucl. Acids Res. 18:5566.

    Choi, G.H. and D.L. Nuss. 1992. A viral gene confers hypovirulence-associated traits to the chestnut blight fungus. EMBO J. 11:473-477.

    Choi, G.H. and D.L. Nuss. 1992. Hypovirulence of chestnut blight fungus conferred by an infectious viral cDNA. Science 257:800-803.

    Choi, G.H., D.M. Pawlyk and D.L. Nuss. 1991. The autocatalytic protease p29 encoded by a hypovirulence-associated virus of the chestnut blight fungus resembles the potyvirus-encoded protease HC-Pro. Virology 183:747-752.

    Choi, G.H., T.G. Larson and D.L. Nuss. 1992. Molecular analysis of the laccase gene from the chestnut blight fungus and selective suppression of its expression in an isogenic hypovirulent strain. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions 5:119-128.

    Choi, G.H., D.M. Pawlyk, B. Rae, R. Shapira and D.L. Nuss. 1993. Molecular analysis and overexpression of the gene encoding endothiapepsin, an aspartic protease, from Cryphonectria parasitica. Gene 125:135-141.

    Cortesi P. and Milgroom M.G. 1998. Genetics of vegetative incompatibility in Cryphonectria parasitica. Applied & Environmental Microbiology. 64(8):2988-2994.

    Double M.L. and MacDonald, W.L. 2002. Hypovirus deployment, establishment and spread: results after six years of canker treatment. Phytopathology 92:s94.

    Double M.L., MacDonald W.L. and Nuss D.L. 1998. Rates of sexual recombination by transgenic hypovirulent strains of Cryphonectria parasitica in a forest setting. The Second International Chestnut Symposium, October, 1998. Bordeaux, France, G. Salesses, ed.

    Enebak, S.A., W.L. MacDonald, and B.I. Hillman. 1994. The effect of dsRNA associated with isolates of Cryphonectria parasitica from the central Appalachians to dsRNAs from North America and Europe. Phytopathology. 84(5):528-534.

    Fahima, T., Y. Wu, L. Zhang, and N. K. Van Alfen. 1994. Identification of the putative RNA polymerase of Cryphonectria hypovirus in a solubilized replication complex. J. Virology 68:6116-6119.

    Farias, G.M., Elkins, J.R., and Grifin, G. J. 1992. Tannase activity associated with growth of Cryphonectria parasitica on American and Chinese chestnut extracts and properties of the enzyme. Eur. J. F.r. Path. 22:392-402.

    Farias, G.M., Gorbea, C., Elkins, J.R., and Griffin, G.J. 1994. Purification, characterization, and substrate relationships of the tannase from Cryphonectria parasitica. Phys. Mol. Plant Path. 44:51-63.

    Frothingham, E.H. 1912. Second-growth hardwoods in Connecticut. USDA Forest Service Bulletin #96, Washington, DC, 59 pp.

    Galloway, B.T. 1926. The search in foreign countries for blight-resistant chestnuts and related tree crops. USDA Department Circular #383, Washington, DC, 16 pp.

    Gao, S. and Shain, L. 1993. Purification and characterization of an endopolygalacturonase from Cryphonectria parasitica. Phytopathology 83:1352.

    Gao, S. and Shain, L. 1994. A possible association between reduced or inhibited polygalacturonase of Cryphonectria parasitica and resistance to chestnut blight. Southwide Forest Disease Workshop. Asheville, NC.

    Gao, S. and Shain, L. 1994. Characterization of an endopolygalacturonase produced by the chestnut blight fungus. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 45:169-179.

    Gao, S. and Shain, L. 1994. Reduced polygalacturonase activity in dsRNA-containing hypovirulent strains of cryphonectria parasitica. IN: Proceedings, International Chestnut Conference, M.L. Double and W.L.MacDonald eds., pp. 35-40. WV University Press, Morgantown, WV.

    Gao, S. and Shain, L. 1994. The effect of preformed tannins and proteins in American and Chinese chestnut bark on a purified polygalacturonase from Cryphonectria parasitica. Phytopathology 84:1096.

    Gao, S. and Shain, L. 1995. Activity of polygalacturonase produced by Cryphonectria parasitica in chestnut bark and its inhibition by extracts from American and Chinese chestnut. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 46:199-213.

    Gao, S. and Shain, L. 1995. Effects of osmotic potential on virulent and hypovirulent strains of the chestnut blight fungus. Can. J. For. Res. 25:1024-1029.

    Gao, S. and Shain, L. 1995. Effects of water stress on chestnut blight. Can. J. For. Res. 25:1030-1035.

    Gao, S. and Shain, L. 1992. Reduced polygalacturonase activity in dsRNA-containing hypovirulent strains of Cryphonectria parasitica. Abstracts, International Chestnut Conference, Morgantown, WV., p. 27.

    Gao, S., G.H. Choi, L. Shain and D.L. Nuss. 1996. Cloning and targeted disruption of enpg-1 encoding the major in vitro extracellular endopolygalacturonase of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. App. & Environ. Microbiology 62:1984-1990.

    Garrod, S. W., D.W. Fulbright, and A.V. Ravenscroft. 1985. Dissemination of virulent and hypovirulent forms of a marked strain of Endothia parasitica in Michigan. Phytopathology 75:533-538.

    Grent, J. 1965. Les formes Hypovirulentes d'Endothia parasitica et les espoirs de lutte contre le chancre du chbtaignier. C.R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Agr. France 51: 1033-1037.

    Groome P.C., Tattar, T.A., and Mount, M.S. 2001a. Bacillus megaterium: a potential biocontrol agent against chestnut blight. J. American Chestnut Foundation 15:45-49

    Groome P.C., Tattar T.A. and Mount, M.S. 2001b. Bacteria found on American chestnut bark and their potential in biocontrol of chestnut blight. Arboriculture Journal 25:221-234.

    Hillman, B.I., D.W. Fulbright, D.L. Nuss and N.K. Van Alfen. 1995. Hypoviridae. In: Sixth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. (F.A. Murphy, C.M. Fauquet, D.H.L. Bishop, S.A. Ghabrial, A.W. Jarvis, G.P. Martelli, M.A. Mayo and M.D. Summers, Eds.) Springer-Verlag, Wien.

    Hillman, B.I., D.W. Fulbright, D.L. Nuss, N.K. Van Alfen. 1995. Hypoviridae in VirusTaxonomy, Classification and Nomenclature of Viruses. Springer-Verlag Wein New York. pp. 261-264.

    Jarosz A.M. Dahir S.E. and Double M.L. 2002. Spatial patterns of blight and hypovirus spread with the West Salem chestnut stand. Phytopathology 92:s94.

    Kazmierczak, P., P. Pfeiffer, L. Zhang, and N. K. Van Alfen. 1996. Transcriptional repression of specific host genes by the mycovirus Cryphonectria hypovirus 1. J. Virology 70:1137-1142.

    Kim, D. H., D. Rigling, L. Zhang, and N. K. Van Alfen. 1995. A new extracellular laccase of Cryphonectria parasitica is revealed by deletion of Lac1. Mol. Plant Microbe-Interact. 8:259-266.

    Kubisiak, T. L., F. V. Hebard, C. D. Nelson, J. Zhang, R. Bernatzky, H. Huang, S. L. Anagnostakis, and R. L. Doudrick. 1997. Mapping resistance to blight in an interspecific cross in the genus Castanea using morphological, isozyme, RFLP, and RAPD markers. Phytopathology in press.

    Liu Y-C., Double M.L., MacDonald W.L. and Milgroom M.G. 2002. Persistence of Cryphonectria hypoviruses after their release for biological control of chestnut blight in West Virginia forests. Journal of Forest Pathology 32: 345-356.

    Mahanti, N., C. Monteiro-Vitorello, H. Bertrand, and D. W. Fulbright. 1993. Elevated mitochondrial alternative oxidase activity in dsRNA-free, hypovirulent isolates of Cryphonectria parasitica. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 42:455-463.

    Milgroom, M.G., Wang, K., Zhou, Y., Lipari, S. E., and Kaneko, S. 1996. Intercontinental population structure of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Mycologia 88:179-190.

    Milgroom, M.G. and Cortesi, P. 1999. Analysis of population structure of the chestnut blight fungus based on vegetative incompatibility genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96(18):10518-10523.

    Parsley, T. B., Chen, B., Geletka, L. M. and Nuss, D. L. Differential modulation of cellular signaling pathways by mild and severe hypovirus strains. Eukaryotic Cell 1:401-413, 2002.

    Pierson, A.H. 1913. Wood-using industries of Connecticut. CT-AES Bulletin #174, New Haven, CT, 96 pp.

    Powell, W.A., C.M. Catranis, and C.A. Maynard. 1995. Synthetic Antimicrobial Peptide Design. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 8:792-794

    Rigling, D. and N.K. Van Alfen. 1993. Extra-and intracellular laccases of the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:3634-3639.

    Sasaki, A., Onoue, M., Kanematsu, S., Suzaki, K., Miyanishi, M., Suzuki, N., Nuss, D. L. and Yoshida, K. 2002. Extending Chestnut Blight Hypovirus Host Range within Diaporthales by Biolistic Delivery of Viral cDNA. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interactions 15:780-789.

    Senter, S.D., J.A. Payne, G. Miller, and S.L. Anagnostakis. 1994. Comparison of total lipids, fatty acids, sugars and nonvolatile organic acids in nuts from four Castanea species. J. Sci. Food Agric. 65:223-227.

    Shain, L. 1993. The induction of antifungal hydrolases in forest trees. 6th International Congress of Plant Pathology, p.126.

    Shain, L. 1996. Host-pathogen interactions between Castanea spp. And the chestnut blight fungus. Abstracts, APS/MSA Joint Annual Meeting, p126

    Shain, L. and Spalding, R.J. 1993. Induction of chitinase and B-1,3-glucanase in American and Chinese chestnut. Southwide Forest Disease Workshop., Auburn, AL.

    Shain, L. and Spalding, R.J. 1995. Quantitation of chitinase and B1,2-glucanase in bark of American and Chinese chestnut. Phytopathology 85:1142.

    Shain, L., Miller, J.B., and Spalding, R.J. 1994. Responses of American and Chinese chestnut to Cryphonectria parasitica and ethylene. In: Proceedings of the International Chestnut Conference. M.L. Double and W.L. MacDonald, eds., pp 97-101, WV Univ. Press, Morgantown, WV.

    Shapira, R. and D.L. Nuss. 1991. Gene expression by a hypovirulence-associated virus of the chestnut blight fungus involves two papain-like protease activities: Essential residues and cleavage site requirements for p48 autoproteolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 266:19419-19425.

    Smart, C.D. and D.W. Fulbright. 1995. Characterization of a strain of Cryphonectria parasitica doubly infected with hypovirulence-associated dsRNA viruses. Phytopathology 85:491-494.

    Suzuki, N., Geletka, L. M. and Nuss, D. L. 2000. Essential and dispensible virus-encoded replication elements revealed by efforts to develop hypoviruses as gene expression vectors. J. Virol. 74:7568-7577.

    Suzuki, N., Chen, B., and Nuss, D. L. 1999. Mapping of a Hypovirus p29 protease symptom determinanat domain with sequence similarity to potyvirus HC-Pro protease. J. Virol. 73:9478-9484.

    Tattar, T. A., P. M. Berman, E. Y. Gonzalez, M. S. Mount, and A. L. Dolloff. 1996. Biocontrol of the Chestnut Blight Fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Aboricultural Journal 20:449-469.

    van Heerden, S. W., Geletka, L. M., Preisig, O., Nuss, D. L., Wingfield, B. D. and Wingfield, M. J. 2001. Characterization of South African Cryphonectria cubensis isolates infected with a C. parasitica hypovirus. Phytopathology 91:628-632.

    Vannini, A., C.D. Smart and D.W. Fulbright. 1993. The comparison of oxalic acid production in vivo and in vitro by virulent and hypovirulent Cryphonectria (Endothia) parasitica. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 43:443-451.

    Wang, P. and D.L. Nuss. 1995. Induction of a cellobiohydrolase I gene from C. parasitica is suppressed by hypovirus infection and regulated by a G-protein mediated signaling pathway involved in fungal pathogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:11529-11533.

    Zhang, L., A.C.L. Churchill, P. Kazmierczak, D-H. Kim, and N.K. Van Alfen. 1993. Hypovirulence-associated traits induced by a mycovirus of Cryphonectria parasitica are mimicked by targeted inactivation of a host gene. Molecular and Cellular Biology 13:7782-7792.

    Zhang, L., D. Villalon, Y. Sun, P. Kazmierczak and N.K. Van Alfen. 1994. Virus-associated down-regulation of the gene encoding cryparin, an abundant cell-surface protein from the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Gene 139:59-64.

    Zon, R. 1904. Chestnut in Southern Maryland. U.S.D.A. Bureau of Forestry Bulletin #53, Washington, DC, 31pp.

    Attachments:

    [DESCRIPTION_OF_COOPERATION.doc] [ne140pub.html]

    Internal Linkages:

    External Linkages:

    Signatures:


    s:/John F. Anderson

    Last Modified: unknown

    Back to Top