WERA043: Developing Sustainable and Organic Pest Management Programs for Western Orchard Systems
- October 01, 2008 to September 30, 2013
- Administrative Advisor(s):
Ralph Cavalieri (WN.P) - Co-advisor
- NIFA Reps:
Robert M. Nowierski
Statement of Issue(s) and Justification:Apple and pear are grown on 300,000 acres in five states (WA, OR, ID, UT, CA) and the region accounts for 70% of the fresh market apples sold in the US and 90% of the total pear production. In addition, walnuts are produced on nearly 200,000 acres in CA. Organophosphate (OP) insecticides have historically been the most widely used class of insecticides in pome fruit orchards in the western US. Most of these insecticides have been targeted at control of Codling moth (CM), Cydia pomonella L., and leafroller species (Beers and Brunner 1991, NASS 1992, NASS 1994, NASS 1996, NASS 1998, NASS 2000, NASS 2002, NASS 2004, NASS 2006), both key pests of western pome fruit production (Beers et al. 1993). Resistance to OP insecticides has been documented in the key pests of pome fruit, codling moth and leafrollers, throughout the western US (Varela et al. 1993, Knight et al. 1994) as well as in other fruit producing regions (Reissig et al. 1986, Lawson et al. 1997, Waldstein et al. 1999, Ahmad et al. 2002). Many secondary pests, such as aphids, leafhoppers, and leafminers, have also developed high levels of resistance to OP and carbamate insecticides.
The impact of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) has been to cancel registrations of or limit the availability of OP insecticides in many crops, including tree fruits and nuts, because apple and pear are important foods in the diets of infants and children (NAS 1993). While the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has continued regulatory actions continue against older insecticides they have registered several new insecticides and miticides classified as reduced risk and/or OP replacements for use on pome fruits. These new insecticides generally offer much greater safety margins for humans and the environment compared to products they replace. There is concern and some evidence (Dunley et al. 2006) that resistance development in key pests will develop in a few years if the newly registered insecticides are not managed appropriately. The availability of new pest control tools in several different chemical classes (IRAC 2007) provides an opportunity to develop sound resistance management strategies to conserve new products. However, having more chemical control choices also makes management decisions more complex, especially when differences of timing, stage specificity, and increased demands of operational factors (spray coverage) of the new products are considered.
The widespread adoption of CM mating disruption (CMMD) in western apple and pear orchards resulted from efforts of the Codling Moth Areawide Management Project (CAMP) - 1995-1999 (Calkins 1998, Brunner et al. 2001). The same group of scientists involved in CAMP conducted two additional projects, IFAFS (Building a multi-tactic pheromone-based pest management system in western orchards) and RAMP (Enhancing pheromone mating disruption for lepidopteran pests in western orchards), which helped stabilize and extend the benefits of CAMP through research and educational activities. Results of the latter two grants expanded the use of CMMD in apple and pear (c.a. 70% of acres in WA by 2005) and helped establish a foundation for adopting new chemical control technologies in apple and pear pest management programs.
The traditional mechanisms of delivering pheromone to orchards for purposes of pest control have been to hand apply dispensers at densities of 200-400 per acre. New delivery systems have been developed in attempts to improve the efficacy of pheromone treatments and automate delivery or reduce costs. These new systems include microencapsulated formulations (Knight and Larsen, 2004, Il'Ichev et al. 2006, Stelinski et al. 2007b), flake of fiber technologies (Doane 1999), wax-based formulations (DeLame et al. 2007, Stelinski et al. 2007c), meso-dispensers (Doane 1999), and puffers or misters (Isaacs et al. 1999, Knight 2004, Stelinski et al. 2007a). Results with these alternative pheromone delivery systems have been variable across pest species (Gut et al. 2004) but the research activity in this area has brought some challenges to the classical thoughts on mechanisms of pheromones when used as controls for agricultural pests (Miller et al. 2006a,b). In addition, the discovery that the CM was able to detect and respond to a kairomone, pear ester, (Light and Knight 2005, Knight et al. 2005, Knight and Light 2005, Michell et al. 2008) has opened up new areas of research on this and similar kinds of chemistries for use as monitoring devices or as controls.
A major impact of the IFAFS and RAMP grants was insights on the effect of reduced risk and OP replacement insecticides on certain biological control agents. These newly registered insecticides were initially considered of lower risk to biological control agents but studies have demonstrated sublethal impacts that have resulted in disruption of important natural control systems relied upon for years.
The proposed new coordinating committee broadens the focus of the previous committee. The new coordinating committee will provide a vehicle to continue and enhance the coordination of research projects and exchange of ideas and information that exist within the region and to expand the focus to crops other than pome fruits. It will coordinate activities and possibly hold joint meetings, with committee participants from the eastern US working on similar kinds of issues associated with deciduous tree fruits.
The proposed coordinating committee will address issues of transitioning IPM programs to reduced risk or OP replacement insecticides, development of new methods of pheromone delivery for mating disruption, development and evaluation of kairomone-based or pheromone-kairomone monitoring methods, determination of the impact of reduced risk or OP replacement insecticides on natural enemies, evaluation of how modification of orchard habitats and nearby natural habitats can enhance biological control, and information transfer to pest management decision makers. All of these issues are of critical importance to the western orchard industry. New knowledge generated from these activities will provide greater stability of "soft" pest control programs allowing growers and crop consultants to implement multi-tactic programs with a greater degree of confidence. The transition to reduced risk or OP replacement insecticides will reduce risk of negative environmental impacts of pest management practices, a benefit to all citizens living in the western region. However, the group most directly benefiting from this transition will be farm workers.
Stakeholders (fruit growers, packer-shippers, farm workers) consistently identify insect injury to the crop or products used to control them as being among their top priorities. In the western US the codling moth, leafrollers, pear psylla and western cherry fruit fly are annually among the highest priority for research funding by commodity commissions. Market access is more and more being determined by pesticide residue issues as much as fruit quality. Insecticides, especially the older broad-spectrum products, are those marketers are scrutinizing on fruits and vegetables. The western US exports a significant portion (30-35%) of tree fruit crops each year. The threat of closure of foreign markets due to contamination of export shipments by pests is an increasing concern to the tree fruit industry. For example, the apple industry estimated that closure of the Taiwan apple market in 2004 cost the industry $25 million in lost revenue due to the discovery of codling moth larvae in three fruit shipments.
The group of scientists who have and will again participate in the WERA-43 coordinating committee represents a group that has been collaborating for several years and represent individuals from CA, OR, UT, and WA. This group has successfully written and acquired competitive federal grants based on ideas and synergy arising from past WERA-43 meetings. The CAMP, IFAFS, and RAMP projects are excellent examples but not the only ones. In addition, many research and extension personnel from the mid-west and east coast who work in tree fruit crops regularly attend WERA-43 meetings and contribute to discussion and also are collaborators on research projects. The research objectives and procedures in this proposal are in most cases on-going activities that the WERA-43 participants are already involved with. Therefore the technical feasibility of proposed research activity is well established.
The negative impact on biological control agents of newer insecticides through sub-lethal effects represents a challenge to the future of "soft" pest control programs in orchard systems. This information has, however, allowed scientists to realistically classify new insecticides and their effects on biological control agents and this will help growers make better selections of products and how to use them in their pest management programs.
A large cooperative project, the genesis of which was a previous WERA-043 meeting, has contributed much to the discussion on understanding mechanisms of pheromone mating disruption and how to stabilize programs using this technology. This project developed baseline data on behavior and electro-physiology of codling moth that will be used to address future questions of resistance development to pheromones. Additional advances in pheromone mediated pest control would be expected as a natural part of the new project. Research into alternative methods of delivering pheromones will lead to products that are less expensive and more effective than current products. This will result in lower costs to growers, increased use of pheromone technologies as well as increased use of safer pesticides.
The promise that kairomones may be useful to enhance pheromone mating disruption is being more carefully evaluated and critical questions have arisen out of past meeting discussions. The interactions at the 2007 WERA-043 meeting stimulated interest and intentions by several researchers to pursue further this avenue of investigation. Additional advances on the use of kairomones and associated technologies could enhance pheromone mating disruption of provide better monitoring tools to help stabilize pheromone-based systems.
The threat of resistance development to newly registered insecticides has raised interest in scientists contributing more of their resources to this area and will likely result in formation of collaborative working groups in this area. Concerns over resistance from the WERA-043 group will help shape pest management recommendations toward sound resistance management strategies for growers.
Phenology models for codling moth are being re-examined in light of biological data indicating a shift in pest life histories over time. A group within WERA-043 is looking at ways to make model output easier to use as tools in pest management through the development of a Decision Aids System (DAS) (http://entomology.tfrec.wsu.edu/das/). This latter system integrates weather data, model output, pest management recommendations and negative effects of pesticides on natural enemies in real time via the web. Systems like DAS can be shared across regions to make real-time on-line pest management decisions available to more in the fruit industry.
- Enhance pheromone mediated mating disruption technologies for key pests by optimizing the pheromone release rate per dispenser and number of point sources per area.
- Improve the efficacy of semiochemical pest control systems by developing and/or evaluating novel pheromone or pheromone/kairomone delivery systems for orchard pests.
- Speed the adoption and integration of new pesticides into comprehensive insect management programs for conventional and organic systems. This will include efficacy studies against pests, resistance issues, and the impacts of the pesticides on key natural enemies.
- Enhance conservation biological control by charaterization of natural enemy phenology and landscape-level approaches to enhance natural enemy populations within and outside orchards.
- Facilitate the development of new monitoring methods and predictive models to reduce pesticide inputs in orchard systems through establishment of cooperative projects.
- Reduce duplication of effort by working closely with colleagues in the eastern U.S. to establish joint projects with common goals and hold joint meetings for reviews and planning purposes.
- Develop educational programs in concert with Extension educators that will provide the basis for adoption of new information and technologies by target industries and use accepted tools for measuring changes in attitudes and practices.
Procedures and ActivitiesThe annual meeting of WERA-43 uses a combination of focused research presentations, moderated group discussions, and long-range planning discussions to provide rapid information flow between laboratories and regions, open discussion of patterns in larger datasets, and identification of emerging issues. Issues have ranged from on-going pest management problems to invasive species that pose potential risks to orchard systems, e.g., the light brown apple moth.
Collaboration within the group has already fostered the setting up regional projects that have begun to address the stated objectives. The yearly meetings allow members to coordinate projects so that we can amplify results from one region to another by implementing simultaneous experiments in several locations.
By inviting scientists from the eastern U.S. to participate in the annual meeting we will capture a perspective represented by a large geographical range with differences in climate that impact pest and natural enemy complexes not available from only meeting with the western committee members. We will be able to minimize duplication and increase focus on the common issues. For example, collaborative projects in the past have included implementation of large-scale pheromone mating disruption programs, shared testing of new technologies (plant based volatile lures or new pheromone dispensers), and development of new collaborative grants (mechanisms of mating disruption or landscape management of pests in nut crops).
Expected Outcomes and Impacts:
- New pheromone products and delivery systems will be critically evaluated by unbiased scientists and the best products/systems will be recommended for use in appropriate crops. This will happen faster and at lower overall expense than with scientists working in isolation. It is possible that new pheromone products/delivery systems will be more efficient and therefore less expensive for the grower or will bring mating disruption technology to new crops where old pheromone dispensing systems were not practical.
- There will be a better understanding and utilization of newly registered insecticides for pest control as growers and crop consultants understand which pests they should target with which insecticides, at what rates and time during the growing season, and how these materials affect and interact with the natural enemy fauna. In addition, there will be a better understanding on how to use new products in a resistance management scenario that will preserve their efficacy and reduce overuse. Information will also be made available that will allow the confirmation or rejection of claims of insecticide resistance when they arise.
- Orchard environments will be altered in ways that will conserve natural enemies of pests and therefore enhance conservation biological control in orchard systems. New insecticides will be evaluated and recommended for pest suppression that have little or no effect on natural enemies or at times that minimize their negative impacts on natural enemies. Orchards or nearby habitats will be modified in ways that conserve natural enemies in close proximity, thus reducing barriers to immigration and establishment. The result will be either reduced insecticide use for selected pests or better pest suppression leading to reduced crop losses, or both. Increasingly, orchardists are becoming aware of the interconnected nature of commodities for both the pest and natural enemies as they relate to metapopulation dynamics.
- There will be an exchange of ideas and/or information/data between scientists working in the areas of tree fruit and nut crops in the western region and colleagues in the eastern U.S. This will result in joint projects with common research goals, the development of joint research and implementation grants, and reduction of duplication of efforts.
Project Participation:Include a completed Appendix E form
This group has a history of effective outreach to agricultural constituencies that draws upon the different expertise and experiences within the working group members. Where cooperative projects are organize among participants there will be plans to organize and/or participate in workshops, conferences, and symposia at local, regional, national and international meetings. The group will publish interpretive articles for popular press outlets to highlight the results and impacts of research and outreach programs. In addition web sites will be developed, or added to, as a means of disseminating research results in ways that are geared towards the integration of the various concepts needed for clientele groups. The group will work with specialists in the science of surveys to assess and document changes in practices and attitudes that result from the extension/outreach activities of the group.
The leadership of the committee will involve three committee members, the Chairperson, Past-Chairperson, and Vice-Chairperson. In the first year the new committee meets, the two initial officers, Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson, will be elected via email ballot of committee members. The Administrative Advisor will conduct the email ballot. The Chairperson will automatically move to the post of Past-Chairperson and serve one term. The Vice-Chairperson will automatically move to the post of Chairperson and serve one term. A new Vice-Chairperson will be elected at each annual committee meeting. The Chairperson will organize and provide for local arrangements of the annual meeting with assistance of the Past-Chairperson. The Vice-Chairperson will serve as the secretary of the annual meeting and prepare the report for the committee. Committee members at the beginning of each annual meeting will decide the location of the next annual meeting.
The only request is that Experiment Station Directors of states from which members originate support the travel of specified representatives and the Administrative Advisor to attend annual meetings.
Literature Cited:Ahmad, M., R. M. Hollingworth and J. C. Wise. 2002. Broad-spectrum insecticide resistance in obliquebanded reafroller Choristoneura rosaceana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) from Michigan. Pest Manag. Sci. 58: 834-838.
Beers, E. H., and J. F. Brunner. 1991. Washington state apple and pear pesticide use survey, 1989-1990. Report to USDA-NAPIAP.
Beers, E. H., J. F. Brunner, M. J. Willet, and G. M. Warner. 1993. Orchard pest management: a resource book for the Pacific Northwest. Good Fruit Grower, Yakima, WA.
Brunner, J. F., S.Welter, C. Calkins, R. Hilton, E. Beers, J. Dunley, T. Unruh, A. Knight, R. Van Steenwyk, P. Van Buskirk. 2001. Mating disruption of codling moth: a perspective from the Western United States. IOBC wprs Bull. Vol. 25(1): 207-215.
Calkins, C. O. 1998. Review of the codling moth areawide suppression program in the Western United States. J. Agric. Entomol. 15(4): 327-333.
deLame, F.M., J.R. Miller, C. A. Atterholt and L. J. Gut. 2007. Development and evaluation of an emulsified paraffin wax dispenser for season-long mating disruption of Grapholita molesta in commercial peach. J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 1316-1327.
Doane, C.D. 1999. Controlled-release devices for pheromones. In: Scher, H.B. (ed) Controlled-Release Delivery Systems for Pesticides, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp. 295-317.
Dunley, J.E., J.F. Brunner, M.D. Doerr and E.H. Beers. 2006. Resistance and cross-resistance in populations of Choristoneura rosaceana and Pandemis pyrusana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Washington apple. Journal of Insect Science, 6:14, Available online: insectscience.org/6.14.
Gut, L.J., L.L. Stelinski, D.R. Thomson and J. R. Miller. 2004. Behavior-modifying chemicals: prospects and constraints in IPM. In: Koul, O., G.S. Dhaliwal and G. Cuperus (eds) Integrated Pest Management - Potential, Constraints, and Challenges. CABI Press, N.Y., pp. 73-121.
Il'ichev, A.L., L.L. Stelinski, D.G. Williams and L.J. Gut. 2006. Sprayable microencapsulated sex pheromone formulation for mating disruption of Oriental fruit moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Australian peach and pear orchards. J. Econ. Entomol. 99:2048-2054.
IRAC. 2007. Insecticide Resistance Action Committee Mode of Action Classification, July 2007. www.irac-online.org
Isaacs, R, M. Ulczynscki, B. Wright, L.J. Gut & J.R. Miller. 1999. Performance of a microsprayer specifically designed for pheromone-mediated control of insect pests. J. Econ. Entomol. 92: 1157-1164.
Knight, A.L. 2004. Managing codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with an internal grid of either aerosol Puffers or dispenser clusters plus border applications of individual dispensers. J. Entomol. Soc. B C 101: 69-77.
Knight, A. L., J. F. Brunner, and D. Alston. 1994. Survey of azinphosmethyl resistance in codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Washington and Utah. J. Econ. Entomol. 87(2): 285-292.
Knight, A.L. and T.E. Larsen. 2004. Improved deposition and performance of a microencapsulated sex pheromone formulation for codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) with a low volume application. J. Entomol. Soc. B C 101: 79-86.
Knight, A.L. and D.M Light. 2005. Seasonal flight patterns of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) monitored with pear ester and codlemone-baited traps in sex pheromone-treated apple orchards. Environmental entomology. 34: 1028-1035.
Knight, A.L., R. Hilton and D.M. Light. 2005. Monitoring codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in apple with blends of ethyl (E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate and codlemone. Environmental entomology. 34(3): 598-603.
Lawson, D. S., W. H. Reissig and C. M. Smith. 1997. Response of larval and adult obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to selected insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 90: 1450-1457.
Light, D. M. and A. L. Knight. 2005. Specificity of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) for the host plant kairomone, ethyl (2E,4Z)-2,4-decadienoate: field bioassays with pome fruit volatiles, analogue, and isomeric compounds. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 53 (10):4046-4053.
Miller, J. R., L.J. Gut, F. M. deLame and L.L. Stelinski. 2006a. Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone: (Part 1) Theory. J. Chem. Ecol. 32:2089-2114.
Miller, J. R., L.J. Gut, F. M. deLame and L.L. Stelinski. 2006b. Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone: (Part 2) Case studies. J. Chem. Ecol. J. Chem. Ecol. 32:2115-2143.
Mitchell, V. J., Lee-Anne Manning, L. Cole, and others. 2008. Efficacy of the pear ester as a monitoring tool for codling moth Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in New Zealand apple orchards. Pest management science. 64, no. 3 (2008 Mar.): 209-214.
[NASS]. National Agric. Statistics Serv. 1992. Agricultural chemical usage, 1991 fruit crops. NASS, Washington, DC.
[NAS]. National Academy of Science. 1993. Report on diets of infants and children. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
[NASS]. National Agric. Statistics Serv. 1994. Agricultural chemical usage, 1993 fruit crops. NASS, Washington, DC.
[NASS]. National Agric. Statistics Serv. 1996. Agricultural chemical usage, 1995 fruit crops. NASS, Washington, DC.
[NASS]. National Agric. Statistics Serv. 1998. Agricultural chemical usage, 1997 fruit crops. NASS, Washington, DC.
[NASS]. National Agric. Statistics Serv. 2000 Agricultural chemical usage, 1999 fruit crops. NASS, Washington, DC.
[NASS]. National Agric. Statistics Serv. 2002. Agricultural chemical usage, 2001 fruit crops. NASS, Washington, DC.
[NASS]. National Agric. Statistics Serv. 2004. Agricultural chemical usage, 2003 fruit crops. NASS, Washington, DC.
[NASS]. National Agric. Statistics Serv. 2006. Agricultural chemical usage, 2005 fruit crops. NASS, Washington, DC.
Reissig W. H., B. H. Stanely and H. E. Hebding. 1986. Azinphosmethyl resistance and weight related response of obliquebanded reafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larvae to insecticides. J. Econ. Entomol. 79: 329-333.
Stelinski, L.L., L.J. Gut, D. Epstein, P. McGhee and M. Haas. 2007a. Evaluation of aerosol devices for simultaneous disruption of sex pheromone communication in Cydia pomonella and Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Pest Sci. 80:225-233.
Stelinski, L.L., P. McGhee, M. Haas, A. L. Il'ichev and L.J. Gut. 2007b. Sprayable microencapsulated sex pheromone formulations for mating disruption of four tortricid species: Effects of application height, rate, frequency, and sticker adjuvant J. Econ. Entomol. 100:1360-1369.
Stelinski, L.L., J.R. Miller, R. Ledebuhr, P. Siegert and L.J. Gut. 2007c. Season-long disruption of Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae) by one machine application of pheromone in wax drops (SPLAT-OFM). J. Pest Sci. 80:109-117.
Varela, L. G., S. C. Welter, V. P. Jones, J. F. Brunner, and H. Riedl. 1993. Monitoring and characterization of insecticide resistance in codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in four western states. J. Econ. Entomol. 86(1): 1-10.
Waldstein, D. E., W. H. Reissig, J. G. Scott and R. W. Straub. 1999. Susceptibility of obliquebanded leafroller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations from commercial orchards and unsprayed habitat in New York to tebufenozide. J. Econ. Entomol. 92: 1251-1255.
Back to Top